RSS Feed

Real estate tax in the health care bill?


I received an email from a Realtor friend which included some strong rhetoric about the 3.8% tax on gains from the sale of residential real estate included in the new health care law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act.

The point of the quoted rhetoric was to fuel voter sentiment against Democrats running for Congress in November by alleging that the bill is “set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes.”

The 3.8% tax on gains doesn’t apply to the first $250,000 in gain from the sale of a residence and applies only to single persons earning at least $200,000 annually or couples earning at least $250,000. It’s plainly aimed at only a few households. Here’s a fairly rhetoric-free explanation: http://factcheck.org/2010/04/a-38-percent-sales-tax-on-your-home/.

I don’t think that many Americans are proud of Congress and its lack of bi-partisan cooperation in either crafting legislation to either allow competition or regulation, or some combination of the two,  to effectively address the incredible inefficiencies in the way that health insurance and health care are administered. Large numbers of Americans – often the same people – want Medicare but hate the idea of a single-payer system, thinking of it as socialized medicine, so it’s no wonder that Congress can’t make anyone happy but the health insurance industry.

In the next few months, we’re going to hear a lot about the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and President Obama’s campaign promise to protect all the the highest-earning 2% of Americans from the expiration. James Surowiecki’s analysis of the make up of this top 2% shows that it includes a large number of of business owners and professionals who are essentially treading water, while those who make up the top 0.1% have seen their share of national income triple over the last 25 years. This top 0.1% earn as much as the lowest 120 million Americans. Surowiecki says that “taxing LeBron James and LeBron James’s dentist” at the same 38% rate is a big mistake.

Targeting the top 2%, rather than the top 0.5%, will surely hurt Democrats running for re-election.

Advertisements

About Harry Styron

I'm a lawyer who lives in Branson, Missouri, whose professional interests involve real estate, construction and local government.

2 responses »

  1. It’s amazing how much mis-information is being circulated about the recently passed Healthcare bill. According to a recent poll, Americans incorrectly believe (a) it will cut previously provided Medicare benefits (43%); cut payments to doctors who see Medicare patients (43%); allow government panels to decide about end-of-life care (41%). Richard Wolf had a good article about the misinformation (with clarifications) in USAToday

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-08-12-healthconfusion12_ST_N.htm

    Reply
    • Fred, thanks for your link.

      There is a huge amount of reliable information available on the internet and a massive amount of crap.

      So how do you know the difference? One strategy is to disregard the content that comes from sources who want something, such as a vote or a purchase. Instead, if I have a question, I look for the answers myself, checking more than one source.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: